Compare · Black Holes

Final-State Projection vs Hawking's Information Loss

Black Hole Information Paradox · within family

	Final-State Projection Historical	Hawking's Information Loss Historical
Proposed	2004	1976
Key figures	Gary Horowitz, Juan Maldacena	Stephen Hawking
In one sentence	Horowitz and Maldacena proposed in 2003 that information escapes a black hole not by leaking out gradually but by a postselected boundary condition at the singularity: the quantum state there is required to be maximally entangled with the early Hawking radiation. Under this condition the apparent loss of information from the outside is matched by an exact recovery, and unitarity is preserved by construction. The proposal was historically influential, but Gottesman and Preskill showed within months that postselection enables superluminal signaling unless additional restrictions are imposed. The framework has since been largely superseded by the Island Formula and Replica Wormhole approach.	Hawking argued in 1976 that an evaporating black hole destroys the information about what fell in, which limits prediction beyond ordinary quantum uncertainty.
Predictions	The final state at the singularity is a specific maximally-entangled state with the Hawking radiation, fixed by the postselection prescription rather than emerging from dynamical evolution The Hawking radiation, when computed under the postselection, is no longer thermal: it carries quantum correlations with the matter that fell in, encoded by the boundary condition If the framework is valid, any test for causality violations (signals traveling backward in time or faster than light) should return null results; but the original proposal does not say how that is enforced, so an extra signaling restriction has to be bolted on (the Gottesman-Preskill 2003 constraint) Information leaks out in a burst when the final state is reached, not slowly as the Page curve predicts; that would show up as a sudden change in the correlation structure of the radiation at a specific time, a signature distinguishable in principle from the gradual leakage of the Island Formula sibling variants, though measuring the radiation in that detail is far beyond any practical experiment	A black hole that forms and then evaporates completely turns a pure quantum state into a mixed one, so [[unitarity]] fails for the process as a whole The outgoing radiation carries no record of what fell in beyond the black hole's mass, angular momentum and charge No S-matrix exists for black hole formation and evaporation. A superscattering operator, which maps density matrices to density matrices, takes its place The entropy of the radiation never turns back down as the black hole shrinks, so the radiation does not follow the [[Page curve]] Gravitational collapse sets a limit on prediction that is fundamental and comes on top of quantum uncertainty
Where it breaks	Gottesman and Preskill 2003 showed that postselection of the form Horowitz-Maldacena required enables faster-than-light signaling and acausal influence on the past, unless additional restrictions are imposed that the original proposal does not provide The framework treats unitarity as a boundary condition rather than deriving it from a physical mechanism; many physicists find this unsatisfying as an explanation, even if mathematically consistent The 2019 Island Formula and Replica Wormhole results derive the unitary Page curve from the gravitational path integral directly, without requiring any postselection prescription; this is widely viewed as a more physically grounded resolution Postselection requires picking out a specific microstate at the singularity from a vast space; the original prescription does not say which microstate or why it has the specific entanglement structure required to preserve unitarity	Banks, Susskind and Peskin argued in 1984 that any evolution law of this kind violates either locality or energy-momentum conservation Page estimated in 1993 that information may leak out so slowly at first that a calculation expanded in the ratio of Planck mass to black hole mass would miss it Hawking argued in 2005 that information is preserved, using a Euclidean path-integral argument restricted to asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes. It was not a microscopic account of how the information gets out Penington derived the Page curve in 2019 within a semiclassical gravity calculation for an evaporating black hole in [[anti-de Sitter space]]. It shows how information can escape in that framework; it is a calculation, not an observation
Key unresolved problem	The faster-than-light problem: the kind of postselection this proposal needs, forcing the final state into a chosen outcome, would let signals travel faster than light and so break cause and effect, a fatal flaw the original work left unresolved.	The locality problem: no one has written down an evolution law for information loss that keeps both locality and energy conservation, the obstacle Banks, Susskind and Peskin raised in 1984.
Reader vote	No votes yet	No votes yet

Final-State Projection

2004 · Historical

Hawking's Information Loss

1976 · Historical

Proposed

2004

1976

Key figures

Gary Horowitz, Juan Maldacena

Stephen Hawking

In one sentence

Horowitz and Maldacena proposed in 2003 that information escapes a black hole not by leaking out gradually but by a postselected boundary condition at the singularity: the quantum state there is required to be maximally entangled with the early Hawking radiation. Under this condition the apparent loss of information from the outside is matched by an exact recovery, and unitarity is preserved by construction. The proposal was historically influential, but Gottesman and Preskill showed within months that postselection enables superluminal signaling unless additional restrictions are imposed. The framework has since been largely superseded by the Island Formula and Replica Wormhole approach.

Hawking argued in 1976 that an evaporating black hole destroys the information about what fell in, which limits prediction beyond ordinary quantum uncertainty.

Predictions

The final state at the singularity is a specific maximally-entangled state with the Hawking radiation, fixed by the postselection prescription rather than emerging from dynamical evolution
The Hawking radiation, when computed under the postselection, is no longer thermal: it carries quantum correlations with the matter that fell in, encoded by the boundary condition
If the framework is valid, any test for causality violations (signals traveling backward in time or faster than light) should return null results; but the original proposal does not say how that is enforced, so an extra signaling restriction has to be bolted on (the Gottesman-Preskill 2003 constraint)
Information leaks out in a burst when the final state is reached, not slowly as the Page curve predicts; that would show up as a sudden change in the correlation structure of the radiation at a specific time, a signature distinguishable in principle from the gradual leakage of the Island Formula sibling variants, though measuring the radiation in that detail is far beyond any practical experiment

A black hole that forms and then evaporates completely turns a pure quantum state into a mixed one, so [[unitarity]] fails for the process as a whole
The outgoing radiation carries no record of what fell in beyond the black hole's mass, angular momentum and charge
No S-matrix exists for black hole formation and evaporation. A superscattering operator, which maps density matrices to density matrices, takes its place
The entropy of the radiation never turns back down as the black hole shrinks, so the radiation does not follow the [[Page curve]]
Gravitational collapse sets a limit on prediction that is fundamental and comes on top of quantum uncertainty

Where it breaks

Gottesman and Preskill 2003 showed that postselection of the form Horowitz-Maldacena required enables faster-than-light signaling and acausal influence on the past, unless additional restrictions are imposed that the original proposal does not provide
The framework treats unitarity as a boundary condition rather than deriving it from a physical mechanism; many physicists find this unsatisfying as an explanation, even if mathematically consistent
The 2019 Island Formula and Replica Wormhole results derive the unitary Page curve from the gravitational path integral directly, without requiring any postselection prescription; this is widely viewed as a more physically grounded resolution
Postselection requires picking out a specific microstate at the singularity from a vast space; the original prescription does not say which microstate or why it has the specific entanglement structure required to preserve unitarity

Banks, Susskind and Peskin argued in 1984 that any evolution law of this kind violates either locality or energy-momentum conservation
Page estimated in 1993 that information may leak out so slowly at first that a calculation expanded in the ratio of Planck mass to black hole mass would miss it
Hawking argued in 2005 that information is preserved, using a Euclidean path-integral argument restricted to asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes. It was not a microscopic account of how the information gets out
Penington derived the Page curve in 2019 within a semiclassical gravity calculation for an evaporating black hole in [[anti-de Sitter space]]. It shows how information can escape in that framework; it is a calculation, not an observation

Key unresolved problem

The faster-than-light problem: the kind of postselection this proposal needs, forcing the final state into a chosen outcome, would let signals travel faster than light and so break cause and effect, a fatal flaw the original work left unresolved.

The locality problem: no one has written down an evolution law for information loss that keeps both locality and energy conservation, the obstacle Banks, Susskind and Peskin raised in 1984.

Reader vote

No votes yet