Compare · The Origin of Our Universe
Modern Tired Light Revivals vs Zwicky Original Tired Light
← Back to Modern Tired Light RevivalsPick a variant from Tired Light
Modern Tired Light Revivals Rejected | Zwicky Original Tired Light Rejected | |
|---|---|---|
| Proposed | 1990s / 2010s | 1929 |
| Key figures | Paul Marmet, Lyndon Ashmore | Fritz Zwicky |
| In one sentence | Modern attempts by Paul Marmet, Lyndon Ashmore, and others have proposed specific plasma-based or electron-scattering tired-light mechanisms, but none has matched the combined surface-brightness, time-dilation, and CMB constraints. | Fritz Zwicky proposed in 1929 that photons gradually lose energy as they traverse intergalactic space, producing the observed redshift-distance relation without requiring cosmic expansion. |
| Predictions |
|
|
| Where it breaks |
|
|
| Key unresolved problem | The three-test problem: no revival passes all three checks at once, how distant galaxies dim with distance (the Tolman surface-brightness test), the stretched-out timing of distant supernovae, and the thin spread of intergalactic electrons now measured by fast radio bursts. | The blurring problem: no physical process, no microphysical mechanism, can slowly bleed energy from light over cosmic distances without also knocking the light off course and smearing the sharp images of distant galaxies and quasars. |
| Reader vote | 0% · 0 votes | 100% · 1 vote |
Modern Tired Light Revivals
1990s / 2010s · Rejected
Zwicky Original Tired Light
1929 · Rejected
Proposed
1990s / 2010s
1929
Key figures
Paul Marmet, Lyndon Ashmore
Fritz Zwicky
In one sentence
Modern attempts by Paul Marmet, Lyndon Ashmore, and others have proposed specific plasma-based or electron-scattering tired-light mechanisms, but none has matched the combined surface-brightness, time-dilation, and CMB constraints.
Fritz Zwicky proposed in 1929 that photons gradually lose energy as they traverse intergalactic space, producing the observed redshift-distance relation without requiring cosmic expansion.
Predictions
- Modified tired-light spectra in electron-photon interactions that could in principle be measured in plasma columns
- Static universe surface brightness scaling distinct from expansion-based predictions
- Redshift proportional to distance with no need for cosmic expansion
- Static universe consistent with Hubble's law
- No time dilation of distant events (a key contrast with expansion-based models)
Where it breaks
- Fast radio burst observations constrain intergalactic electron columns inconsistently with Marmet's model
- No revival has reproduced both Tolman surface brightness scaling and SN Ia time dilation simultaneously
- Has not been integrated into a quantitative cosmological model fitting CMB, BAO, and SNe together
- Provides no specific microphysical mechanism
- Any scattering process would necessarily blur distant images, contradicting observations of sharp distant galaxies and quasars
- Cannot account for the CMB, time dilation, or precision cosmological tests
Key unresolved problem
The three-test problem: no revival passes all three checks at once, how distant galaxies dim with distance (the Tolman surface-brightness test), the stretched-out timing of distant supernovae, and the thin spread of intergalactic electrons now measured by fast radio bursts.
The blurring problem: no physical process, no microphysical mechanism, can slowly bleed energy from light over cosmic distances without also knocking the light off course and smearing the sharp images of distant galaxies and quasars.
Reader vote
0% · 0 votes
100% · 1 vote