Skip to content
CosmosExplorer
Compare · Before the Universe

Ekpyrotic Cyclic Universe vs Loop Quantum Big Bounce

← Back to Ekpyrotic Cyclic Universe
Cyclic & Bouncing Cosmologies· within family
Ekpyrotic Cyclic Universe
2001 · Speculative
Loop Quantum Big Bounce
2001 · Speculative
Proposed
2001
2001
Key figures
Paul Steinhardt, Neil Turok, Justin Khoury, Burt Ovrut
Abhay Ashtekar, Martin Bojowald, Parampreet Singh
In one sentence
Our universe was born from a collision between two parallel brane|branes, and the collision repeats every trillion years.
A previous contracting universe bounced, quantum geometry prevented the collapse from becoming a singularity.
Predictions
  • Almost no primordial gravitational waves: the tensor-to-scalar ratio r, the strength of gravitational-wave ripples relative to density ripples, sits near zero (r ≈ 0)
  • The spectrum of primordial density ripples is slightly stronger at large scales than small, a so-called red tilt
  • Each cycle ~10¹² years or longer
  • Quantum bounce at Planck density
  • Modified CMB power spectrum at large angular scales
  • Pre-Bang contracting universe phase
Where it breaks
  • Requires [[string theory]] and extra dimensions
  • Brane-collision mechanism not fully derived
  • Has its own initial-conditions problem
  • Effects only at Planck scale, not currently testable
  • LQG itself is incomplete
  • CMB corrections sub-dominant to cosmic variance
Key unresolved problem
The missing derivation: the brane collision driving the model, two higher-dimensional sheets striking each other, has never been worked out from string theory's basic rules, so the bounce itself stays physically unspecified.
The out-of-reach test: the bounce in loop quantum cosmology only shows up at Planck-scale densities, energies far beyond any experiment we can imagine building, so the prediction stays untestable for now.
Reader vote
0% · 0 votes
100% · 1 vote