Skip to content
CosmosExplorer
Compare · Before the Universe

Loop Quantum Big Bounce vs Ekpyrotic Cyclic Universe

← Back to Loop Quantum Big Bounce
Cyclic & Bouncing Cosmologies· within family
Loop Quantum Big Bounce
2001 · Speculative
Ekpyrotic Cyclic Universe
2001 · Speculative
Proposed
2001
2001
Key figures
Abhay Ashtekar, Martin Bojowald, Parampreet Singh
Paul Steinhardt, Neil Turok, Justin Khoury, Burt Ovrut
In one sentence
A previous contracting universe bounced, quantum geometry prevented the collapse from becoming a singularity.
Our universe was born from a collision between two parallel brane|branes, and the collision repeats every trillion years.
Predictions
  • Quantum bounce at Planck density
  • Modified CMB power spectrum at large angular scales
  • Pre-Bang contracting universe phase
  • Almost no primordial gravitational waves: the tensor-to-scalar ratio r, the strength of gravitational-wave ripples relative to density ripples, sits near zero (r ≈ 0)
  • The spectrum of primordial density ripples is slightly stronger at large scales than small, a so-called red tilt
  • Each cycle ~10¹² years or longer
Where it breaks
  • Effects only at Planck scale, not currently testable
  • LQG itself is incomplete
  • CMB corrections sub-dominant to cosmic variance
  • Requires [[string theory]] and extra dimensions
  • Brane-collision mechanism not fully derived
  • Has its own initial-conditions problem
Key unresolved problem
The out-of-reach test: the bounce in loop quantum cosmology only shows up at Planck-scale densities, energies far beyond any experiment we can imagine building, so the prediction stays untestable for now.
The missing derivation: the brane collision driving the model, two higher-dimensional sheets striking each other, has never been worked out from string theory's basic rules, so the bounce itself stays physically unspecified.
Reader vote
100% · 1 vote
0% · 0 votes