Skip to content
CosmosExplorer
Compare · Before the Universe

Loop Quantum Big Bounce vs String-Gas Cosmology

← Back to Loop Quantum Big Bounce
Pick a variant from Cyclic & Bouncing Cosmologies
Cyclic & Bouncing Cosmologies· within family
Loop Quantum Big Bounce
2001 · Speculative
String-Gas Cosmology
1989 · Speculative
Proposed
2001
1989
Key figures
Abhay Ashtekar, Martin Bojowald, Parampreet Singh
Robert Brandenberger, Cumrun Vafa
In one sentence
A previous contracting universe bounced, quantum geometry prevented the collapse from becoming a singularity.
String-Gas Cosmology proposes that the Big Bang was the dynamics of a gas of fundamental strings, with cosmic structure emerging from string thermodynamics.
Predictions
  • Quantum bounce at Planck density
  • Modified CMB power spectrum at large angular scales
  • Pre-Bang contracting universe phase
  • The number of large spatial dimensions is constrained by string dynamics (predicts three)
  • Specific spectrum of cosmological perturbations from string thermodynamics
  • Distinct signatures in CMB power spectrum that differ from inflation
  • Relationship between primordial gravitational waves and density perturbations
Where it breaks
  • Effects only at Planck scale, not currently testable
  • LQG itself is incomplete
  • CMB corrections sub-dominant to cosmic variance
  • String theory itself has not been experimentally verified
  • Specific predictions are model-dependent and not yet decisive
  • The mechanism for emerging from the high-temperature string gas phase is not fully worked out
Key unresolved problem
The out-of-reach test: the bounce in loop quantum cosmology only shows up at Planck-scale densities, energies far beyond any experiment we can imagine building, so the prediction stays untestable for now.
The missing handoff: no one has fully worked out how the hot early string-gas phase, a dense tangle of vibrating strings, gives way to the ordinary expanding universe we see, so the link to observed physics is incomplete.
Reader vote
100% · 1 vote
0% · 0 votes