Skip to content
CosmosExplorer
Ch.03 The Nature of Space & TimeEmergent Spacetime & Gravity

Banks-Fischler Holographic Space-Time

2001 / 2020Tom Banks, Willy FischlerFrontierReviewed May 27, 2026

A de Sitter holography proposal: spacetime has a finite-dimensional Hilbert space tied to the area of the cosmological horizon. Banks and Fischler are developing the framework as an alternative to AdS/CFT for our positive-cosmological-constant universe.

Skip 3D content

§1 · The claim, in one sentence

Tom Banks and Willy Fischler are developing a de Sitter holography framework in which has a finite-dimensional Hilbert space tied to the area of the cosmological horizon. The program began with the 2001 'M-theory observables for cosmological space-times' paper and continues actively through 2020 (Banks-Fischler 'Holographic space-time, Newton's law, and the dynamics of horizons'). Holographic Space-Time (HST) is an alternative to AdS/CFT for our positive- universe: instead of an infinite-dimensional CFT on a conformal boundary, the framework posits a finite-dimensional Hilbert space whose size grows with the area of the cosmological .

§2 · Why it might be true

The AdS/CFT correspondence (sibling variant) is precise only in anti-de Sitter spacetime, where the boundary is at infinity and the conformal field theory there has infinitely many degrees of freedom. Our universe has positive (de Sitter-like), with a finite cosmological horizon at distance roughly 1/H where H is the Hubble parameter. The de Sitter holographic principle (Bousso, Banks-Fischler in early 2000s) requires a finite-dimensional Hilbert space, in contrast to the infinite-dimensional structure of AdS/CFT.

Banks and Fischler proposed that the appropriate dual description involves a discrete causal-diamond structure with a finite-dimensional Hilbert space whose size grows with the area of the cosmological horizon (in Planck units). The 2001 paper 'M-theory observables for cosmological space-times' (arXiv:hep-th/0102077, 263 INSPIRE citations) established the framework's foundations. The 2001 follow-up 'An holographic cosmology' (arXiv:hep-th/0111142, 156 citations) extended the construction to cosmological evolution.

Both Banks and Fischler are alive and active in this program. The 2020 paper 'Holographic space-time, Newton's law, and the dynamics of horizons' (arXiv:2003.03637, 36 citations) demonstrates the framework's continued development. The 2010 'Holographic space-time and its phenomenological implications' (arXiv:1004.2736) and the 2011 'Holographic Space-Time: The Takeaway' (arXiv:1109.2435) are reader-friendly entry points into the program. The 2010 Banks TASI Lectures (arXiv:1007.4001) provide a structured introduction. The framework is a minority position in the broader holography landscape but is technically alive and contributes to the de Sitter-holography literature.

The family stance

Spacetime is not fundamental. It emerges from a deeper structure: entanglement patterns or thermodynamic relations on horizons. None of these has been confirmed; each makes some testable predictions but most operate at conceptual or structural levels.

§2.5 · Evidence

  • The framework provides one of the few concrete de Sitter holography proposals; the AdS/CFT correspondence is exact only in anti-de Sitter spacetime
  • Banks and Fischler are both active senior researchers (Banks at UC Santa Cruz, Fischler at UT Austin); the program continues to receive contributions and external engagement
  • Connections to mainstream holography (information bounds, Bousso entropy bound, area-law entanglement) provide a substantive foundation for the framework's central claims
  • The 2020 paper's connection to Newton's law from holography is a concrete technical achievement, demonstrating the framework's continued technical productivity

§3 · What you'd need to test it

  • Spacetime has a finite-dimensional Hilbert space whose dimension grows with the area of the cosmological horizon, in Planck units
  • The cosmological horizon is the carrier of physical degrees of freedom; observers in different causal diamonds have access to different finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces with consistent overlap structure
  • Newton's law of gravity emerges from the holographic structure at large distances; the 2020 Banks-Fischler paper makes this connection technically explicit
  • Specific implications for the dynamics of black-hole and cosmological horizons that distinguish the framework from AdS/CFT and other holographic proposals

§4 · Where it breaks

  • The framework is a minority position in the broader holography landscape; the AdS/CFT correspondence dominates the empirical and conceptual conversation
  • The de Sitter holography problem remains unsolved despite Banks-Fischler's work and parallel efforts (Anninos-Hartman-Strominger, others); no consensus de Sitter holography has emerged
  • The framework's predictive content beyond consistency with known physics is limited; few unique observational signatures distinguish it from alternative de Sitter holographic programs
  • Some of the central technical claims (finite-dimensional Hilbert space, specific causal-diamond structure) are framework-defining choices rather than derived properties; the choice itself shapes what can be calculated
Go deeper

The causal-diamond structure central to HST is the set of spacetime events accessible to a finite observer (the intersection of past and future light cones from the observer's worldline). In de Sitter spacetime, the causal diamond is finite in area; HST posits a finite-dimensional Hilbert space whose dimension scales with this area. The framework develops the consequences of this assumption systematically.

Banks and Fischler 2020 (arXiv:2003.03637) derives Newton's law as an effective consequence of the holographic structure at large distances; the construction is technically non-trivial and represents the program's continued productivity. The 2010 Banks TASI Lectures (arXiv:1007.4001, 73 INSPIRE citations) provide a structured introduction to the framework's foundations.

Cross-references: the sibling Holographic Spacetime variant covers the broader holographic principle that AdS/CFT and HST both realize in different settings. The AdS/CFT Correspondence variant in this same family covers the technical alternative for anti-de Sitter spacetime. The Black Hole Information Paradox family in Ch.6 covers specific holographic mechanisms (ER=EPR, Island Formula) that are most cleanly developed in AdS/CFT but motivate parallel HST work.

Banks-Fischler Holographic Space-Time, Tom Banks19971995201019972001
0votes
Currently #1 in this family · #4 in Ch.3
§5 · Who built it, and when(5 sources, 5 established)

Up next

Spotted an error? Have a source to add?

Prefer email?

You can also send a prefilled email with the variant URL already filled in.

Related theories