Compare · Before the Universe
Tryon Vacuum Fluctuation vs Vilenkin's Tunneling from Nothing
← Back to Tryon Vacuum FluctuationPick a variant from Quantum Tunneling Origin
Tryon Vacuum Fluctuation Historical | Vilenkin's Tunneling from Nothing Speculative | |
|---|---|---|
| Proposed | 1973 | 1982 |
| Key figures | Edward Tryon | Alexander Vilenkin |
| In one sentence | Tryon's 1973 Nature paper proposed the universe is a quantum fluctuation with zero net energy, the historical precursor to all "universe from nothing" proposals. | Vilenkin proposed in 1982 that the universe quantum-tunneled into existence from a state with no space, no time, no fields, literal nothing. |
| Predictions |
|
|
| Where it breaks |
|
|
| Key unresolved problem | The pre-existing vacuum problem: Tryon's proposal still starts from a quantum vacuum that already comes with physical laws and geometry, so it explains the universe but not where those prior ingredients came from. | The laws-from-nothing problem: the quantum tunneling that creates the universe still needs quantum laws and a space of possible states to work in, so the proposal has not truly started from nothing. |
| Reader vote | 0% · 0 votes | 100% · 2 votes |
Tryon Vacuum Fluctuation
1973 · Historical
Vilenkin's Tunneling from Nothing
1982 · Speculative
Proposed
1973
1982
Key figures
Edward Tryon
Alexander Vilenkin
In one sentence
Tryon's 1973 Nature paper proposed the universe is a quantum fluctuation with zero net energy, the historical precursor to all "universe from nothing" proposals.
Vilenkin proposed in 1982 that the universe quantum-tunneled into existence from a state with no space, no time, no fields, literal nothing.
Predictions
- Total energy of universe ~ 0
- Universes can spontaneously fluctuate from vacuum
- [[Inflation]] begins naturally with high probability after tunneling
- Universe is initially small, closed, and de Sitter-like
- No contracting phase before the Bang
Where it breaks
- Tryon's proposal still presupposes a quantum vacuum and laws, not truly nothing
- Vilenkin (1982) provides the rigorous framework Tryon lacked
- Krauss: still requires quantum laws, so not really nothing
- Hawking & Bousso (1995): catastrophic particle production
- Penrose: ignores Weyl curvature hypothesis
Key unresolved problem
The pre-existing vacuum problem: Tryon's proposal still starts from a quantum vacuum that already comes with physical laws and geometry, so it explains the universe but not where those prior ingredients came from.
The laws-from-nothing problem: the quantum tunneling that creates the universe still needs quantum laws and a space of possible states to work in, so the proposal has not truly started from nothing.
Reader vote
0% · 0 votes
100% · 2 votes