Compare · Black Holes

Primordial Black Hole Evaporation vs Island Formula and Quantum Extremal Surfaces

← Back to Primordial Black Hole Evaporation

Hawking Radiation· within family

	Primordial Black Hole Evaporation Strongly supported	Island Formula and Quantum Extremal Surfaces Strongly supported
Proposed	1974	2019
Key figures	Bernard Carr, Stephen Hawking, Anne Green, Bradley Kavanagh, Florian Kuhnel	Geoffrey Penington, Ahmed Almheiri, Netta Engelhardt, Donald Marolf, Henry Maxfield
In one sentence	If the early universe produced black holes lighter than about 10^11 kilograms, Hawking radiation would have evaporated them by now or be evaporating them today, possibly producing observable gamma-ray bursts, neutrinos, or gravitational waves. Heavier primordial black holes would still exist and could account for some or all of dark matter. Carr and Hawking proposed this in 1974; fifty years of searches have set tight upper limits without a confirmed detection.	The Island Formula is the specific calculational prescription that lets gravity reproduce the Page curve for Hawking radiation. Independently developed in two 2019 papers, by Penington and by Almheiri-Engelhardt-Marolf-Maxfield, it extends the Engelhardt-Wall quantum extremal surface rule to permit disconnected contributions, the islands. Past the Page time the dominant island absorbs the black hole interior into the radiation's entanglement wedge, which forces the radiation entropy back down along the unitary Page trajectory.
Predictions	Primordial black holes of mass about 10^11 kilograms (about 10^14 grams) should be evaporating now and producing detectable gamma-ray bursts in the GeV range; the predicted spectrum and event rate are calculable from the Hawking formula Heavier primordial black holes (10^17 to 10^23 kilograms, asteroid-mass) could comprise all of dark matter without violating current observational constraints; specific microlensing and CMB signatures should appear if the abundance is high enough PBH mergers should contribute to LIGO/Virgo gravitational-wave signals if PBHs are a significant fraction of dark matter in the stellar-mass range; the predicted mass distribution, spin distribution, and event rate would differ from astrophysical black hole mergers The NANOGrav 2023 pulsar-timing-array gravitational-wave background could be partly consistent with a primordial-black-hole merger population at solar-mass scales; this remains an active research question	The entropy of any region containing Hawking radiation past the Page time is computed by a prescription that includes islands, and that prescription must reproduce the exact Page-curve trajectory; this can be checked in solvable lower-dimensional gravity models where the curve is calculable from start to finish The black hole interior is encoded in the late-time Hawking radiation in a specific, calculable sense, via entanglement wedge reconstruction applied to the radiation region The formula reduces to the Engelhardt-Wall prescription before the Page time and produces the Page-curve drop after it, with the transition driven by which surface dominates the extremization The same prescription applies to any quantum system coupled to gravity, not just to evaporating black holes; the construction is testable in lower-dimensional gravity models like 2D Jackiw-Teitelboim
Where it breaks	No PBH evaporation signature has been detected despite 50 years of searches. Fermi, INTEGRAL, EGRET, and other gamma-ray missions have set upper limits in the evaporating-now mass range; no positive detection has been confirmed Observational constraints are tight across most mass ranges. The surviving windows for PBHs comprising all of dark matter are narrow, concentrated around the asteroid-mass scale (10^17 to 10^23 kg); broader mass distributions are more easily ruled out than monochromatic populations LIGO/Virgo black hole mergers are statistically consistent with astrophysical (non-primordial) origin; PBH contributions remain a research question rather than a confirmed signal The PBH-as-all-dark-matter scenario requires specific early-universe physics (large enhanced perturbations at small scales) that has not been independently observed; the mechanism is not ruled out but is not directly evidenced either	The island prescription has been derived rigorously only in specific toy models; whether it extends to physically realistic four-dimensional evaporating black holes in our universe is conjectured but not yet proved The formula is a prescription for computing the entropy, not a mechanism explaining what physical degrees of freedom encode the interior; the question of what carries information out remains debated The construction relies on entanglement wedge reconstruction in AdS/CFT settings; the carry-over to asymptotically flat space, which is the actual setting of black hole evaporation in our universe, involves additional technical steps that are still being worked out Some authors interpret the island contribution as an artifact of summing over topologies in the gravitational path integral, with no unambiguous local physical interpretation; whether the islands have a direct interpretation as physical interior regions is contested
Key unresolved problem	The missing-detection problem: fifty years of searches have never caught a primordial black hole, one born in the early universe, in the act of evaporating, so the mass range that should be exploding now is pinned down only by what we have failed to see, never by a real signal.	The realistic-black-hole problem: the island prescription has only been derived inside special AdS/CFT model universes, and extending it cleanly to ordinary four-dimensional black holes like the ones we actually observe remains unsolved.
Reader vote	No votes yet	No votes yet

Primordial Black Hole Evaporation

1974 · Strongly supported

Island Formula and Quantum Extremal Surfaces

2019 · Strongly supported

Proposed

1974

2019

Key figures

Bernard Carr, Stephen Hawking, Anne Green, Bradley Kavanagh, Florian Kuhnel

Geoffrey Penington, Ahmed Almheiri, Netta Engelhardt, Donald Marolf, Henry Maxfield

In one sentence

If the early universe produced black holes lighter than about 10^11 kilograms, Hawking radiation would have evaporated them by now or be evaporating them today, possibly producing observable gamma-ray bursts, neutrinos, or gravitational waves. Heavier primordial black holes would still exist and could account for some or all of dark matter. Carr and Hawking proposed this in 1974; fifty years of searches have set tight upper limits without a confirmed detection.

The Island Formula is the specific calculational prescription that lets gravity reproduce the Page curve for Hawking radiation. Independently developed in two 2019 papers, by Penington and by Almheiri-Engelhardt-Marolf-Maxfield, it extends the Engelhardt-Wall quantum extremal surface rule to permit disconnected contributions, the islands. Past the Page time the dominant island absorbs the black hole interior into the radiation's entanglement wedge, which forces the radiation entropy back down along the unitary Page trajectory.

Predictions

Primordial black holes of mass about 10^11 kilograms (about 10^14 grams) should be evaporating now and producing detectable gamma-ray bursts in the GeV range; the predicted spectrum and event rate are calculable from the Hawking formula
Heavier primordial black holes (10^17 to 10^23 kilograms, asteroid-mass) could comprise all of dark matter without violating current observational constraints; specific microlensing and CMB signatures should appear if the abundance is high enough
PBH mergers should contribute to LIGO/Virgo gravitational-wave signals if PBHs are a significant fraction of dark matter in the stellar-mass range; the predicted mass distribution, spin distribution, and event rate would differ from astrophysical black hole mergers
The NANOGrav 2023 pulsar-timing-array gravitational-wave background could be partly consistent with a primordial-black-hole merger population at solar-mass scales; this remains an active research question

The entropy of any region containing Hawking radiation past the Page time is computed by a prescription that includes islands, and that prescription must reproduce the exact Page-curve trajectory; this can be checked in solvable lower-dimensional gravity models where the curve is calculable from start to finish
The black hole interior is encoded in the late-time Hawking radiation in a specific, calculable sense, via entanglement wedge reconstruction applied to the radiation region
The formula reduces to the Engelhardt-Wall prescription before the Page time and produces the Page-curve drop after it, with the transition driven by which surface dominates the extremization
The same prescription applies to any quantum system coupled to gravity, not just to evaporating black holes; the construction is testable in lower-dimensional gravity models like 2D Jackiw-Teitelboim

Where it breaks

No PBH evaporation signature has been detected despite 50 years of searches. Fermi, INTEGRAL, EGRET, and other gamma-ray missions have set upper limits in the evaporating-now mass range; no positive detection has been confirmed
Observational constraints are tight across most mass ranges. The surviving windows for PBHs comprising all of dark matter are narrow, concentrated around the asteroid-mass scale (10^17 to 10^23 kg); broader mass distributions are more easily ruled out than monochromatic populations
LIGO/Virgo black hole mergers are statistically consistent with astrophysical (non-primordial) origin; PBH contributions remain a research question rather than a confirmed signal
The PBH-as-all-dark-matter scenario requires specific early-universe physics (large enhanced perturbations at small scales) that has not been independently observed; the mechanism is not ruled out but is not directly evidenced either

The island prescription has been derived rigorously only in specific toy models; whether it extends to physically realistic four-dimensional evaporating black holes in our universe is conjectured but not yet proved
The formula is a prescription for computing the entropy, not a mechanism explaining what physical degrees of freedom encode the interior; the question of what carries information out remains debated
The construction relies on entanglement wedge reconstruction in AdS/CFT settings; the carry-over to asymptotically flat space, which is the actual setting of black hole evaporation in our universe, involves additional technical steps that are still being worked out
Some authors interpret the island contribution as an artifact of summing over topologies in the gravitational path integral, with no unambiguous local physical interpretation; whether the islands have a direct interpretation as physical interior regions is contested

Key unresolved problem

The missing-detection problem: fifty years of searches have never caught a primordial black hole, one born in the early universe, in the act of evaporating, so the mass range that should be exploding now is pinned down only by what we have failed to see, never by a real signal.

The realistic-black-hole problem: the island prescription has only been derived inside special AdS/CFT model universes, and extending it cleanly to ordinary four-dimensional black holes like the ones we actually observe remains unsolved.

Reader vote

No votes yet