Compare · Before the Universe
Gott-Li Self-Creating Universe vs Vilenkin's Tunneling from Nothing
← Back to Gott-Li Self-Creating UniverseQuantum Tunneling Origin· within family
Gott-Li Self-Creating Universe Historical | Vilenkin's Tunneling from Nothing Speculative | |
|---|---|---|
| Proposed | 1998 | 1982 |
| Key figures | J. Richard Gott, Li-Xin Li | Alexander Vilenkin |
| In one sentence | Gott and Li proposed in 1998 that the early universe contained a closed time loop, allowing the universe to literally create itself. | Vilenkin proposed in 1982 that the universe quantum-tunneled into existence from a state with no space, no time, no fields, literal nothing. |
| Predictions |
|
|
| Where it breaks |
|
|
| Key unresolved problem | The chronology protection problem: as Hawking argued, quantum effects likely pile up runaway energy wherever a closed timelike curve, a path that loops back in time, would form, destroying the time loop this proposal needs before it can exist. | The laws-from-nothing problem: the quantum tunneling that creates the universe still needs quantum laws and a space of possible states to work in, so the proposal has not truly started from nothing. |
| Reader vote | 0% · 0 votes | 100% · 2 votes |
Gott-Li Self-Creating Universe
1998 · Historical
Vilenkin's Tunneling from Nothing
1982 · Speculative
Proposed
1998
1982
Key figures
J. Richard Gott, Li-Xin Li
Alexander Vilenkin
In one sentence
Gott and Li proposed in 1998 that the early universe contained a closed time loop, allowing the universe to literally create itself.
Vilenkin proposed in 1982 that the universe quantum-tunneled into existence from a state with no space, no time, no fields, literal nothing.
Predictions
- The very early universe contained closed timelike curves
- A region of CTC geometry preceded the standard cosmological era
- Some specific predictions about the early universe's geometry differ from standard Big Bang cosmology
- [[Inflation]] begins naturally with high probability after tunneling
- Universe is initially small, closed, and de Sitter-like
- No contracting phase before the Bang
Where it breaks
- Most physicists view closed timelike curves as unphysical or as a sign that general relativity breaks down
- The proposal requires specific energy conditions that may not be physically realizable
- No direct observational test
- Stephen Hawking proposed a "Chronology Protection Conjecture" that argues physics conspires to prevent CTCs from forming
- Krauss: still requires quantum laws, so not really nothing
- Hawking & Bousso (1995): catastrophic particle production
- Penrose: ignores Weyl curvature hypothesis
Key unresolved problem
The chronology protection problem: as Hawking argued, quantum effects likely pile up runaway energy wherever a closed timelike curve, a path that loops back in time, would form, destroying the time loop this proposal needs before it can exist.
The laws-from-nothing problem: the quantum tunneling that creates the universe still needs quantum laws and a space of possible states to work in, so the proposal has not truly started from nothing.
Reader vote
0% · 0 votes
100% · 2 votes