Gravity gets a hidden partner field that switches off near stars.
Galileon Gravity
Gravity gains a partner field with a special symmetry that can drive acceleration and hides itself near stars.
Placeholder for a 3D visualisation of Large-Distance Modified Gravity. The interactive scene will land in Phase 3. This family changes gravity itself at the largest distances. Near stars and galaxies, gravity behaves as general relativity predicts. At distances comparable to the observable universe, it either leaks into an extra dimension or acts as if the graviton has a tiny mass. Either change can make the expansion accelerate with no dark energy, a result physicists call self-acceleration. The program began with the 2000 braneworld model of Dvali, Gabadadze and Porrati. Its four-dimensional limit led to the Galileon, and a 2014 review derives ghost-free massive gravity from the same higher-dimensional starting point. The three models here use different mechanisms, and all of them rely on screening, usually the Vainshtein mechanism, to hide their extra force near the Sun. The flagship self-accelerating solutions have since met ghost instabilities, poor fits to cosmological data and the 2017 measurement of the speed of gravity.
§1 · The claim, in one sentence
Gravity gains an extra field, taken from the DGP braneworld, that can accelerate the expansion while switching itself off near stars and planets.
Why this was rejected
- ▸Renk, Zumalacárregui, Montanari and Barreira (2017) found the cubic Galileon in 7.8 sigma tension with ISW data, which effectively rules it out.
- ▸GW170817 showed gravitational waves and light travel at the same speed to about one part in 10^15. Ezquiaga and Zumalacárregui (2017) found this rules out the quartic and quintic covariant Galileon as an explanation of late-time acceleration.
- ▸Baker and colleagues (2017) found the same measurement severely reduces the range of viable cosmological alternatives to general relativity.
- ▸Leloup and colleagues (2019) checked every cosmological fit of the full Galileon model against the GW170817 time delay and found all of them ruled out.
§2 · Why it might be true
Nicolis, Rattazzi and Trincherini started from the DGP model in a 2009 paper. Below the Hubble scale, every interesting departure DGP makes from general relativity is captured by one extra field. That field is a scalar field coupled equally to all matter, so it acts as part of gravity.
The authors kept the field and dropped the extra dimension. They required a 'galilean' symmetry, under which the field's gradient can shift by a constant. In four dimensions, only five interaction terms survive this symmetry without introducing ghosts.
Near stars and planets, the field's own interactions grow strong and it decouples from matter. This Vainshtein effect keeps solar-system tests in line with general relativity. On cosmic scales the theory has self-accelerating solutions, and unlike DGP's these are free of ghosts.
Deffayet, Esposito-Farèse and Vikman wrote the theory in curved spacetime, also in 2009. This covariant Galileon is the version cosmologists tested against data.
The family stance
These theories try to explain cosmic acceleration by changing gravity at distances comparable to the observable universe, instead of adding dark energy. There gravity either spreads into an extra dimension or behaves as if its carrier particle, the graviton, has a tiny mass. Near stars and planets the extra effects switch off, so solar-system tests still agree with general relativity. The best-known self-accelerating versions face serious stability and observational problems.
§2.5 · Evidence
- The galilean symmetry limits the theory to five possible terms in four dimensions, which makes it tightly constrained.
- It keeps DGP's self-accelerating solutions while removing the ghost instability that ruined them in DGP.
- Chow and Khoury (2009) found its cosmology closely tracks the full five-dimensional DGP model, including a cosmological version of Vainshtein screening.
- Renk and colleagues (2017), before GW170817, found quartic and quintic versions fitting CMB, BAO and ISW data about as well as ΛCDM.
- De Rham and Gabadadze (2010) found the same cubic, quartic and quintic Galileon terms inside ghost-free massive gravity (sibling variant).
§3 · What you'd need to test it
- Late-time acceleration driven by the Galileon field, with no cosmological constant
- In the cubic version, gravitational potentials deepen at late times, which flips the sign of the correlation between cosmic microwave background temperature and nearby galaxies
- In the quartic and quintic versions, gravitational waves travel at a speed different from light at low redshift
- The extra force is screened inside the solar system and other gravitationally bound systems
§4 · Where it breaks
- Once coupled to curved spacetime, the covariant Galileon keeps the Galileon interactions but breaks the exact galilean symmetry that defined the original model.
- Fits need a non-zero neutrino mass to match the data reasonably, around 0.5 eV in Renk and colleagues' analysis.
- Peirone and colleagues (2018) compared Bayesian evidence with ΛCDM and found covariant Galileon models strongly disfavoured by cosmological data.
Go deeper
The DGP decoupling limit reduces to a relativistic scalar π, universally coupled to matter, with derivative self-interactions. Nicolis, Rattazzi and Trincherini generalised it by demanding invariance under a shift of π's gradient by a constant vector. They argued this is the only generalisation of a universally coupled scalar that implements the Vainshtein effect robustly. In 4D the symmetry allows exactly five terms that give sizeable non-linearities without ghosts.
Minimally coupling the Galileon to a dynamical metric produces third-order derivatives in both the Galileon and metric equations. Deffayet, Esposito-Farèse and Vikman found a unique non-minimal coupling to curvature that restores second-order equations with no extra degree of freedom. Its generalisations are the Horndeski and beyond-Horndeski scalar-tensor theories that GW170817 later constrained.
Creminelli and Vernizzi required the gravitational-wave speed to stay equal to light for nearby cosmologies too, to avoid tuning. Of the three functions in quartic and quintic beyond-Horndeski theories, only one survives, a conformal coupling to the Ricci scalar in the Horndeski case. Sakstein and Jain combined GW170817 with the absence of strong equivalence-principle violation by the black hole in M87. Together these make the quartic Galileon cosmologically irrelevant.
▸§5 · Who built it, and when(11 sources, 11 established)
- EstablishedNicolis, Rattazzi & Trincherini (2009). 'The Galileon as a local modification of gravity.' Phys. Rev. D 79, 064036
- EstablishedDeffayet, Esposito-Farèse & Vikman (2009). 'Covariant Galileon.' Phys. Rev. D 79, 084003
- EstablishedChow & Khoury (2009). 'Galileon Cosmology.' Phys. Rev. D 80, 024037
- EstablishedRenk, Zumalacárregui, Montanari & Barreira (2017). 'Galileon gravity in light of ISW, CMB, BAO and H0 data.' JCAP 10, 020
- EstablishedLIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi-GBM & INTEGRAL Collaborations (2017). 'Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A.' Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L13
- EstablishedEzquiaga & Zumalacárregui (2017). 'Dark Energy After GW170817: Dead Ends and the Road Ahead.' Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251304
- EstablishedCreminelli & Vernizzi (2017). 'Dark Energy after GW170817 and GRB170817A.' Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251302
- EstablishedBaker, Bellini, Ferreira, Lagos, Noller & Sawicki (2017). 'Strong constraints on cosmological gravity from GW170817 and GRB 170817A.' Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251301
- EstablishedSakstein & Jain (2017). 'Implications of the Neutron Star Merger GW170817 for Cosmological Scalar-Tensor Theories.' Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251303
- EstablishedPeirone, Frusciante, Hu, Raveri & Silvestri (2018). 'Do current cosmological observations rule out all Covariant Galileons?' Phys. Rev. D 97, 063518
- EstablishedLeloup, Ruhlmann-Kleider, Neveu & De Mattia (2019). 'Observational status of the Galileon model general solution from cosmological data and gravitational waves.' JCAP 05, 011
Variants in this family
Compare variantsUp next
Spotted an error? Have a source to add?
Prefer email?
You can also send a prefilled email with the variant URL already filled in.